See point one.

Right now in this thread you are trying to prove that god isn't real, therefore you are the ones who would have to back up your claim with reasons. This thread is literally named: "There are no valid arguments for the existence of God" And the first thing that is said is: [quote]Lately, I've been seeing tons of illogical arguments that Christians have been trying to use to prove the existence of God. I haven't seen one valid argument for God, and I'm getting quite tired of destroying the same feeble arguments over and over again, so I thought I'd take the most common ones and take them apart, so that you people can finally stop using them. [quote]You can't prove that God isn't real[/quote] This is a logical fallacy. The burden of proof lies on the person claiming the positive (religious people), not us. If you believe God is real, it's your job to provide evidence.[/quote] In other forums that the Christians are trying to prove that god is real, sure that works. But in this thread it says in the title that Noiseless is trying to disprove the existence of god making him have the burden of proof, due to he is the one trying to make the claim. If you apply this too replies to the thread, then this still won't work in your favor, I've seen replies support this topic, then people reply saying something to support God. The offender just responds with point 1. I understand that if we were making the argument we'd have to back it up, but just in case you still don't understand, Noiseless is making an argument here, which is trying to claim that there are no valid points for the existence of God.

I'm not trying to disprove God.