{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/18/2015 8:02:04 AM
1
[quote]Someone would have tried to sue, and lose the case by now.[/quote]
Right there you did, try again.
English
-
Um, no? what drugs are you on?
-
Um yes, just a bit of weed thanks. You said someone would have tried to sue by now, clearly saying that I was wrong in what I originally said as no one had sued yet. At least try dude, seriously.
-
Try what? Arguing with you? Because, that's not gonna happen. It was a statement, not an answer to yours. an addition to what I said that got chopped up by your response. OUT.OF.CONTEXT. And weeds not a drug...
-
Really, so cannabis isn't a drug now, ok....... I guess were into the realms of fantasy now. It was in direct response to me so how is that out of context? And here is more proof, not that it's needed by anyone but you, for some reason. [quote]any legality issues would have arose way before now.[/quote] Clearly saying that the ToS must be ironclad. Seriously, at least try dude, at least put a little thought into what you're saying.
-
Clearly that states "any legality would have arose by now" and that is it. What's wrong with you people?
-
Ha ha ha, it's ok, I know you can't admit to your mistake. Lots of you kids have no fortitude these days.
-
Edited by Shadowspriter21: 9/18/2015 9:48:53 AMHuh, ain't that ironic? Go smoke a bowl, I think your getting sober on me.
-
I'm sure you spoke then, it's just you said nothing so I'm not certain.
