{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
9/13/2015 9:44:42 PM
1
-
If you were to average my stats, they would be better than yours. My kills combined add to 210,000+. What else is there to compare besides medal score. I just recently started playing PvP regularly within the last two or three months.
-
Trials stats are real. Comapre. You do not hold up. You played a lot but your medals show the skills. You clearly are not a true PvP player and if You think You are sorry to burst your bubble but your not. You just have 3 hunters. I had three but deleated them . hunters will be my main class always. But to come on here a prove your a better Hunter is kiddish. Compare trials. Good luck. I'm top 1% and I don't go calling people fake.
-
You have a 1.68 compared to my 1.60. You have a 367 combat rating compared to my 366. How exactly do I not hold up?
-
Experience. I have close to 200,000kills on one hunter. Kds will never prove the skill. I can make a new Hunter , get 10 kills and 0 deaths and be a 100% kd. now imagine 175,000 kills on one character with 1.5kd. Lots of games played. Think about it.
-
Then you can't equate my skill to the amount of games I've played, considering there aren't many.
-
Which is why I am not upset a fellow Hunter is trying to be better. Just don't let it get to your head. Millions of people have hunters.
-
Edited by ZombieKami: 9/13/2015 10:22:17 PMI never said I am better than anyone else. Nor am I trying to demean your Hunter. I am simply saying that one can't claim to be 100% Hunter unless they have 100% Hunters. You may, in fact, be better at playing a Hunter than me. There is no shame for me in that fact.
