{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/29/2015 3:36:53 PM
1
Wrong and wrong. Being straight or Lgbt+, is somewhat reflective in your genes, but by a small amount, it's more focused on social relationships. And do you honestly believe you are that mentally strong to defy normal psychology and sociology? You do not directly choose who you love, you grow into it after years of interaction of others and self-thought.
(I'm not judging views, just your reasoning.)
English
-
Edited by Ice Oblivion IV: 8/29/2015 3:51:52 PM'Somewhat reflective'? Points for trying with that clause (Not convincing to me). Social relationships, sure, I'll give you that. And no, to answer your question. I just believe that being a homosexual is a choice, not something they are BORN with. That's like saying people are capable of being born (and/or concieved) gay.
-
How many points exactly....? (7.8/10 I hope, because memes) [url=http://www.example.com]https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg22429963-700-gay-gene-discovery-has-good-and-bad-implications/[/url] -Take it with your grain of salt of course.
-
Bonus points, dude, bonus points. The article you linked SPECULATES the idea of finding one's sexuality in one's genes. It does not say one's sexuality CAN be found in one's genes.
