{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/25/2015 11:18:48 PM
1
Your fuсking statement in the OP is literally a subjective p.o.s that is an opinion. It's so retarded that it's ridiculous kek
What you did is literally the definition of an appeal to authority, kiddo. Even if it was to shorten it, it was still an appeal to authority
English
-
Call it what you will. You are trying to find technicalities as a way of avoiding the truth.
-
Your sources are Christians or of that faith branch since childhood lmao They're invalid with confirmation bias, as per the rules of arguments
-
Your sources are not Christian, so they too are biased. Again, you should stop looking at technicalities and start looking for truth.
-
Again with the assumption that you are always and undeniably correct See, my sources aren't biased because I use facts that are of observable and testable nature, and not the quotes of humans that are prone to err. You were the only one here to bring in a person to appeal to an authority. I used things of no bias.
