{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/25/2015 11:17:18 PM
1
No, sorry. The empty tomb and no trace of his body anywhere is the evidence. We don't need a shroud to determine that. That's why I never mentioned it.
English
-
Omfg you just restated nearly verbatim what I said and said I was wrong. It's not even like you fuсking changed any logic of it, you just added an easily falsifiable tidbit "All whole numbers can be square rooted!" "Not negative!" "Yes, they can" "Nu uh, because [i]i[/i] isn't a number"
-
You are talking nonsense. You said I mentioned the shroud of Turin, which I didn't. Then you said that the shroud of Turin is the evidence for the resurrection, which it isn't.
-
I never said you mentioned it! I said I referenced it and so when you said stuff that related nearly perfectly with the Turin shroud, it was something to me!
-
Nothing I said was even remotely close to the shroud.
-
[quote]Yep, lack of a body, trustworthy eyewitness accounts, dying for what they claim to have seen(not a belief, but what they saw).[/quote] Body I was talking about the Turin shroud when you commented. Obvious to see why I assumed. Dying Idk if people died to halt science, but wouldn't be surprised. Happened before. Claim to have seen Claim to have seen...the shroud of Jesus? Makes sense in the context of my subject
