{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
8/24/2015 2:47:07 AM
1
Well if we're going to continue with the burger analogy then let me reiterate. Atheists may not understand the layers or ingredients and the context thereof, but don't need to in order to [b]taste[/b] the burger and see if it really is the best/legitimate.
I'm sorry to say your argument is nothing more than tunnel vision and dodging the real argument.
English
-
That was never my argument. In the op I said they could believe whatever they want, but the arguments they make against it don't hold up, because they lack context and a willingness to search for an answer.
-
And the only way a Christian believes a person has gained context and understanding is if they believe. It's a cyclical bs wheel of fggtry
-
Not true.
-
You already proved it in another reply chain It's circular logic all the way to the papacy
-
Biggest problem often times is that too many group atheists to a centralized cause when really the only thing we typically hold in common is a lack of belief pertaining to gods. The missing link is the fact that identifying a flawed argument from one atheist is no better than assuming all party members of any given religion will confront you with the same exact method of attempting to invalidate one's beliefs.
