Firstly let me compare this to a court hearing. "Innocent until proven guilty" the [u]positive[/u] claim is presumed false until it proven beyond reasonable doubt. In this case the claiming for the existence of god would be the positive claim. Secondly "Supreme being" the word supreme is often and regularly associated with extraordinary, therefore the title alone of your God suggests it is unusual, unnatural, not common thought. Thirdly, do you really believe in creationism, cmon man the fact that creationism is banned by law to be taught as science implies it is false and that it's contender (of sorts), evolution is much more appropriate to teach as true. There is overwhelming evidence for evolution and natural selection, 15 minutes of googling Charles Darwin would tell you that.