{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/30/2015 3:02:40 AM
13
They're not babies; they're fetuses. It's a method of recycling which is a natural part of our world. When I die, I'd like the same done to me. I don't want to be buried in some coffin.
If I am to be buried, I'd prefer to be used as fodder for plants or other living things.
English
-
I'd kinda like to donate my husk to the training of cadaver dogs.
-
It's good to at least still offer some use after death no?
-
Its not even a waste yet
-
What's not a waste?
-
the fetus
-
Are thinking I'm referring to the fetus as waste because of what I said about recycling?
-
Thats what it implies, but im basing it off a techinicality
-
I meant recycling as in the non-viable fetus gets used in a potentially useful way. It's morbid.
-
It just sounds wrong because recycling is used for objects
-
I can't really think of a better term than recycle other than reuse.
-
Wold dies. Decomposed by bacteria and fungi. Nutrients absorbed by grass. Deer eats grass. Wolf eats deer [b]Recycling![/b]
-
Edited by numenor_lord_eLk: 7/30/2015 4:00:49 AMThats nature, theres no conviction or moral
-
You said recycling was of objects. I just gave a good example of how the term could be applied to living things.
