{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/7/2015 7:37:20 PM
4
I wanted to be butthurt at this idea as I've never gone flawless.
But it's pretty reasonable.
English
-
I'm not saying it has to be, but looking at skolas, vault o glass, crota, etc. Flawless trials should be there as well.
-
Flawless trials is marred by lag, cheaters, and people who have already gone flawless that week continuing to play just to -blam!- over other people trying to get it. You know what all that pve content doesn't have against it? Anything I just mentioned. Any pve encounter can be practiced and beaten. The only people who want flawless as a requirement are the elitists who think pvp is the only thing that should count for anything. Well, a HUGE portion of the player base doesn't like pvp, especially for the reasons I mentioned. I'm glad flawless isn't a requirement.
-
Edited by THENOTORIOUSDYB: 7/7/2015 8:55:57 PMSo tired of this. I'm not that good at crucible. I am average. But if you can communicate and and get a decent team you can go flawless. Stop blaming lag people and realize you guys suck. Stop making excuses. I play a ton of trials and barely run into lag or cheaters. It's an excuse people use because they blow
-
I didn't blame lag for anything. I said crucible is plagued by it, and it is. Good for you for making it. I don't care to fight through the BS to even try. The game mode is no fun, at all. It's a thorn fest filled with elitists playing after they've finished to prevent others from making it. I don't want to waste hours trying to go flawless. A better argument could be made for getting 9 wins as a requirement, but not flawless.
