In his own write up of the interview Tom Phillips (Eurogamer) comes across badly. He refuses to even attempt to understand the explanations being given and his follow up questions are self centred and don't probe any deeper into those answers, they simply restate the initial premise. He comes to no conclusions following the interview (he actually makes some conclusions [b]before[/b] the transcript where he is almost fair, but the format means that this is largely overlooked) The Forbes piece is written by Paul Tassi who has been highly critical of many aspects of Destiny previously. It is clear from his previous positions that he is highly emotional about the game. His piece is not a well written analysis of the interview, it is little more than a hyped up forum rage post designed to drive traffic to his site and cause some community uproar. Of course, if you are already upset by the issues, there is little that Bungie can do to calm you without changing their basic position. This is the case for both Tom Phillips and Paul Tassi. They are not independent. They have bias from the start. They write their pieces from their biased standpoints. They never acknowledge their own positions but rather disguise themselves as interviewers and news reporters rather than the opinion writers that they are. Don't get sucked in by this clickbait.