JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

Destiny

Discuss all things Destiny.
Edited by talisin: 6/25/2015 3:57:33 AM
201

Should Bungie make Luke Smith publicly apologize?

Yes- his was smug and money hungry

2236

No- it's a business, we are consumers.

1361

After reading the entire euro gamer interview and the recent Forbes magazine piece release today- hard to see bungie not addressing this soon. Apparently DeeJ has said there will be something better in store for current gamers, but they don't know what yet. They are scrambling to do damage control after this guy made them looks like corporate assholes. Leave your opinion and comments below! READ--- An apology is not about Luke Smith, it's about bungie admitting fault. By him apologizing it means Bungie OK the apology and is apologizing trough him to a degree, while them apologizing directly would be ideal, that's not going to happen. UPDATE ON DLC!!!!!---- Bungie has partnered with Red Bull and now an "Epic Quest" which originally os part of TTK is only accessible if you purchase a special can of Red Bull and get the access code. Otherwise you have to wait until mid-December to play it if you don't buy Red Bull. [url=http://kotaku.com/new-destiny-quest-is-exclusive-to-red-bull-1713588960]Bungie requires Red Bull purchase for new DLC Quest[/url] Bungie doesn't care about the consumers, only their money. You now have to purchase 3rd party products in order to play something you will have purchased outright. Where does it end? Edit- sorry for the grammatical error, should say HE. Edit-- Why do all you fools keep saying "your sad to get so upset over a few emotes..." It has absolutely nothing to do with the emotes. It has to do with the principle of respecting your consumers/clientele and not be arrogant enough to blatantly speak about such people as if they are idiots and will buy whatever shit your pushing. This is 2015 there is no more "it's just a videogame company" or "he's just a designer" Wrong. He is a part of a major corporate conglomerate and as such anything he says or does in the public eye (and sometimes private) it's open for judgement and criticism. That's just life today. He gets no pass for being insensitive to his buyers. Neither does bungie. It isn't about emotes it's about expectations of a company to its consumers. I guess the difference in opinions depends if your an adult with a career who understands business or if your a teen or college student. I would be pressed to say most career working adults with families would lean towards the understanding of how there was a fault committed from a business ethics standpoint. UPDATE**** Luke Smith apologizes and TTK prices are changed.... [url=http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive/2015/06/24/bungie-39-s-luke-smith-apologizes-for-destiny-collector-39-s-edition-comments-pricing-changes-on-the-way.aspx]game informer article[/url]

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • Edited by RMSi_10nm: 6/23/2015 5:25:51 AM
    In his own write up of the interview Tom Phillips (Eurogamer) comes across badly. He refuses to even attempt to understand the explanations being given and his follow up questions are self centred and don't probe any deeper into those answers, they simply restate the initial premise. He comes to no conclusions following the interview (he actually makes some conclusions [b]before[/b] the transcript where he is almost fair, but the format means that this is largely overlooked) The Forbes piece is written by Paul Tassi who has been highly critical of many aspects of Destiny previously. It is clear from his previous positions that he is highly emotional about the game. His piece is not a well written analysis of the interview, it is little more than a hyped up forum rage post designed to drive traffic to his site and cause some community uproar. Of course, if you are already upset by the issues, there is little that Bungie can do to calm you without changing their basic position. This is the case for both Tom Phillips and Paul Tassi. They are not independent. They have bias from the start. They write their pieces from their biased standpoints. They never acknowledge their own positions but rather disguise themselves as interviewers and news reporters rather than the opinion writers that they are. Don't get sucked in by this clickbait.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    5 Replies
    1 2
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon