Circular reasoning. You can't argue that God is real because it says so in the bible and the bible was inspired by the word of God therefore God is real. You have started with the conclusion and the premise of your argument is in need of as much evidence to support it than the conclusion.
Well you can argue it, who am I to tell you not to. But if you do argue it that way you have spent a lot of time arguing from a standpoint that is logically false and doesn't hold up to any form of reasoning.
English
-
There are more outside sources proving the bible true. Archaelogical findings such as buildings and other text from eyewitnesses. We dont blindly follow the bible just because it exists.
-
There was an eyewitness in a well preserved building watching God create Adam and Eve?
-
Please tell me where i said that. I never said that. The house of a disciple has been found, proving he was real. MULTIPLE texts from both believers and non believers eyewitnesses have been found recording events such as the resurrection of Jesus. There are also more archeological findings pointing to it being true
-
It is quite a large leap to go from finding evidence of disciples and Jesus as men being real to then say that this proves God. Jesus is also made mention of in the Qur'an, so your point adds as much credence to the God described in the Islamic faith as it does the Christian God.