{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
6/1/2015 4:57:32 PM
1
By your logic, anyone who doesn't agree with you is wrong and is making excuses. These are valid counter arguments to what you are saying. You want everyone to see things from your point of view but don't want to do the same when some offers a different point kid. The shotgun has barely changed design in like 200 years. The ammunition and system used to deliver the shot are most likely different. You're assuming these guns use a standard black powder ignition system. Which is stupid to assume. Since they don't require the same things modern convential fireearms need to fire they can look and fire whatever way the person who created it want it to. If they want it to look like a revolver they can. It doesn't impact the actual functionality or mechanics of the gun. You're trying to compare apples and oranges seeing as most of the guns in game, even the hand cannons and such, simply cannot exist because the ammunition they use hasn't been created or doesn't exist. And seeing as we can't tell what the future holds we don't know if something like this would be created. Your argument is null and void.
English
-
Edited by JustOnePepsi: 6/1/2015 5:10:41 PMUgh, I'm going to have to piecemeal this out... [quote]By your logic, anyone who doesn't agree with you is wrong and is making excuses.[/quote] Demonstrably untrue. [quote]These are valid counter arguments to what you are saying.[/quote] No they're not. They're excuses meant to avoid the topic at hand, and it's irritating. [quote]The shotgun has barely changed design in like 200 years. [/quote] This doesn't help your point. [quote]The ammunition and system used to deliver the shot are most likely different.[/quote] The ammunition is not the topic of this discussion. [quote]You're assuming these guns use a standard black powder ignition system.[/quote] No I'm not. [quote]Which is stupid to assume.[/quote] Just as stupid as assuming it was assumed in the first place. [quote]Since they don't require the same things modern convential fireearms need to fire they can look and fire whatever way the person who created it want it to.[/quote] This doesn't make the design any less wrong. [quote]If they want it to look like a revolver they can. It doesn't impact the actual functionality or mechanics of the gun.[/quote] Yes they can, and yes it does, if they expect suspension of disbelief. [quote]You're trying to compare apples and oranges seeing as most of the guns in game, even the hand cannons and such, simply cannot exist because the ammunition they use hasn't been created or doesn't exist.[/quote] Composition/division. [quote]And seeing as we can't tell what the future holds we don't know if something like this would be created.[/quote] Which is why it's fair to judge them based on the same principles with which they were designed, which is quite obviously the mechanical functionality of [i]modern firearms[/i]. [quote]Your argument is null and void.[/quote] Your assertion is patently false.
-
And you're a scrub in this game. Get good haha
-
And you called me the "kid"...
-
The only thing based off anything modern are the aesthetics. Pure and simple. You're comparing how something looks with how it works. You can't. Therefore you're wrong. Have a good day being wrong, over there in your wrongness just wronging it up all day wrong
-
Thank you for agreeing with me.
