{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/25/2015 2:53:37 AM
19
It is a great workable scientific theory. However, I do not take it as fact that it is the spark of life on earth.
English
-
[quote]It is a great workable scientific theory. However, I do not take it as fact that it is the spark of life on earth.[/quote] That's great. Because anybody that actually understands evolution sees it as a theory used to explain the diversification of the species.
-
Obviously
-
abiogenesis is a separate thing from evolution. I cringe when I see the phrase "molecules to man evolution."
-
I am aware of the theory for life beginning. I personally find it ridiculous to think that some bacteria ate each other and that created life. ( laymens terms )
-
Bacteria are alive
-
You don't -blam!-in say.
-
Couldn't help it.
-
It has nothing to do with the origins of life.
-
Lucky for you, evolution says nothing about how life got here.
-
*points below*
-
It doesn't claim to be. If you were educated at all, you'd know that. Abio genesis and evolution are two different things.
-
Did I say it did
-
Why would you even say that you don't think it's the spark that started life then? That's like saying that apples aren't oranges. It's redundant, and makes you sound even dumber than you really are.
-
It doesn't claim to be.
-
Edited by angry0lbgrampa: 5/25/2015 3:53:42 AMDid I say it did?
-
Saying that you don't take it as fact for creating the spark of life would imply that. Otherwise, what's the point of even saying that.
-
Because it is held aloft by many idiotic anti-theists as the source of life.
-
No it isn't. It explains the diversity of life - the only people I meet that confuse it with abiogenesis are theists. But regardless of who thinks it, it is still wrong. You are implying that not knowing what caused abiogenesis somehow undermines evolution [b]but it doesn't[/b].
-
