Then it would be equally easy for you to find them too! I am not here to spoon feed you. Try any proper scientific website. Try peer reviewed papers. [i]Please provide an article that is not speculated and is provided by one one's credentials that you trust.[/i] This is your thread, and the original post does not fit the criteria you are now asking for. It is speculated with no evidence as back up, and put forward by someone who has no qualifications in the relevant field. The irony of now requesting that from me to refute an unsupported claim in the first place should not be lost on anyone. But anyway, this is all an aside. I began this thread by pointing out that evolution and abiogenesis are two different subjects. To quote the original article; "Evolution is a fact only at a very small scale. It is fantasy when it is used to explain how plants and animals came into existence..." No-one is claiming that evolution gives an answer to how life began. He [i]must[/i] know that if he has done any reading. It therefore cannot be a considered a problem with the theory of evolution, as evolution has nothing to say on the matter. The question of how life began, abiogenesis, is unanswered so far by science. We simply do not now yet. To even claim that the fact that we can't yet explain abiogenesis has any impact on evolution is incredibly dishonest or hugely ignorant. So within the first two lines of the article, the author is either lying or showing that he doesn't understand the subject he sees fit to talk about, it really is that simple.