This sort of reply acts a smokescreen. You respond in so many different ways, even down to correcting spelling or syntax that you can make it look like you have provided a proper counter argument. You have not. At one point you went into suffixes in detail and didn't even address the point of the passage you corrected! In the usual apologist manner, all you are doing is posting a wall of text, presumably so it is hard to scrutinise some of your more nonsensical assertions, or at least time consuming enough that people decide they can't be bothered. If we're going to endlessly quote one another, I need a pc instead of a phone or this becomes far too time consuming, so I'll address your 'argument' when I get home. However from this point on, maybe it would help to stay on subject and try to be concise?