{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
5/2/2015 6:38:22 PM
7
*proceeds to slap you with a hardcover copy of [i]On the Origin of Species[/i]*
English
-
*proceeds to slap with this quote* Darwin stated, "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I confess, absurd in the highest degree...The difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye could be formed by natural selection , though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered subversive of the theory."
-
Darwin not having all the answers doesn't debunk anything. We now know how the eye formed over time.
-
It's not just about the eye Britton. It's about the question as to how complexity could even evolve.
-
Please source the quote
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/2/2015 7:20:04 PM...in [i]On the Origin of Species[/i], chapter 6.
-
Just checking you're not using wikipedia
-
Edited by SSG ACM: 5/5/2015 1:31:07 PMNo. I hate Wikipedia, but I'm at least happy that they provide most of their acclaimed info at the bottom of their sites.
