{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/30/2015 3:01:24 PM
1
I just saw pictures. No specific link. I think some of them were carved in the great deprssion, and other's are supposedly a 3 toed dinosaur walking on its heels for some reason. But just google image it.
English
-
Yeah without a peer reviewed study, its just a google image.
-
Wouldn't the peers believe what their peers believe? It seems like that's easily abused.
-
No, peer-reviewed means the study has been looked over by multiple people, professors and scientists. This provides an unbiased viewpoint. They look at the information acquired and determine its legitimacy. A google image, showing human and dinosaur bones does not fit that description.
-
Oh. So it's unbiased because of the multitude of people, and not whether they share the same ideas? I just wanted to know what you thought about it. Have you seen the dinosaurs on the cave art?
-
Close to it, scientist don't hold a biased position, they follow that data, observations evidence. There is none for creation, so it is dismissed in science. If credeble evidence can be provided, they will look into it further. Google images is not credible evidence.
-
I was just asking your opinion on it, dang. And everyone's biased, yo.
-
But there's one thing scientists love. Being more right than other scientists. Think about it.
-
