{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
4/30/2015 10:20:17 AM
2
Sorry, i was sleeping LOL, but what about the small insects found in Amber, scientists extracted DNA from them because the amber preserved them extraordinarily well. The testing showed relation to modern day insects.
English
-
What about them? Are they still not insects? The Darwinism mechanism has never been shown to be capable of creating new genetic information or new complex body parts such as wings, eyes, or brains. Without a mechanism that can be demonstrated to be capable of the necessary creation, the theory of evolution is just a fantasy with no real scientific basis. So something was preserved in an organism that can be observed with modern insects. Is that not expected as much as one would suppose? I do intend to find similarities among those that were and that which is known as "the modern living" generation that are still exhibiting those similar traits.
-
Just because there is relation, doesn't make evolution. That relation shows that there was ONE creator.
-
No, no it doesn't.. Humans are related to apes and bonobos, we are not related to whales however. We share common ancestry with apes, we do not come from apes
-
Did i say we are related to whales? Don't think so!
-
Actually, if you looked into it, you'd find that we are related to a multitude of things. We are related to whales, as we are fellow mammals. We are even related to corn.
