{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/19/2015 9:38:40 PM
4
There's numerous sites that if they had found fossils they would
Be popping up everywhere they found fossils of it but they have not found any transversal fossils known to this date even paleontologist agree there are no transversal bones to this day so Charles Darwin theory is a crock of shit
English
-
Please, punctuate.
-
Not necessarily. A great deal of microevolutions are in the soft bits of creatures. Denser musculature, or thicker/thinner hair, or adaptations to the squishy bits that decompose. Not to mention that fossilization requires a very specific set of conditions to occur, so possibly those transversal bones occurred where/when the conditions were less than valid for fossilization. Also, Darwin's theory isn't the entirety of Evolution as a theory.
-
Micro evolution doesn't prove evolution. God created his creatures with a way to adapt. If animals couldn't adapt when, say a natural disaster hit or humans invaded their habitat they would become extinct. Also no evidence of macro evolution has been found. Only micro. And micro evolution doesn't prove evolution
-
Macro evolution exists in the form of speciation. The instant small changes hit a point that the original species and the altered version are no longer capable of reproducing, they've become two different species, which is a macroevolution.
