{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/19/2015 1:01:10 AM
2
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're saying that evolution and the big bang and so on are just what God used to create everything? Pretty interesting way to look at things actually.
English
-
No, I'm not saying both Big Bang and evolution support God. God said let there be light and it was so. Don't you think a big bang would probably be a flash of light? I'm not pushing back the goal posts. I'm stating that science is trying prove the existence of a God wrong and they are actually proving Him right. Evolution however, doesn't have anything to do with creationism.
-
Sure a big bang would produce light. But no one was alive at that time and no one sure as hell heard god say that. Science doesn't actually try to prove god doesn't exist, but many findings convince people there is none. Science is about understanding the world and universe around us.
-
That's because they're pushing the goal posts back because they know they're wrong
-
Fair enough
