{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/10/2015 3:54:43 PM
1
-
Dogs haven't evolved ..... They are bred to change ..... People took dogs and bred them together they didn't evolve into a totally different species of dog. But let's go with this .... Your telling me a Labrador over time could evolve into a pit bull?
-
Psst. Changes through breeding is evolution.
-
No they are not
-
By definition, it is. You must not understand how evolution works.
-
Edited by Tempest26: 3/11/2015 6:05:29 PMI know how evolution works ..... Even the people who wrote about it and discovered it found holes in their theories and have contradicted themselves and even came out with other statements that disproved their first statements .... Hawking, Darwin etc ... Darwin proposed a theory, but he has two entire chapters that state the evidence his theory required that was missing. He assumed the evidence would be there some time in the future. At this writing, it is 2010, over one hundred and fifty years later. If the evidence to support Charles Darwin’s theory was going to be found, it would have been found by now. Evolutionists are always looking for evidence to support their faith in evolution. Some even go so far as to make fraudulent proof for evolution. See my website page: Evolution Frauds. As I say on that page, if there was real evidence, fraudulent evidence would not be needed. This book is promoted as the bible for evolution but it actually has evidence against evolution. Quote by Darwin: “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.” If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life all at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory to descent with slow modification though natural selection.
-
Edited by Britton: 3/11/2015 6:21:02 PM[quote]I know how evolution works. [b]your comments show you dont[/b] Even the people who wrote about it and discovered it found holes in their theories and have contradicted themselves and even came out with other statements that disproved their first statements .... Hawking, Darwin etc ... [b]because that's how science works, as new information is discovered, it is added.[/b] Darwin proposed a theory, but he has two entire chapters that state the evidence his theory required that was missing. He assumed the evidence would be there some time in the future. At this writing, it is 2010, over one hundred and fifty years later. If the evidence to support Charles Darwin’s theory was going to be found, [b](its been found for a long time, Darwin just put the pieces together.)[/b] it would have been found by now. Evolutionists are always looking for evidence to support their faith in evolution. [b]All of biology, molecular biology, paleontology, pretty much all the natural sciences do, and continue to support evolution. Just because you haven't seen what you incorrectly think evolution is doesn't discredit what it actually is.[/b] Some even go so far as to make fraudulent proof for evolution. See my website page: Evolution Frauds. As I say on that page, if there was real evidence, fraudulent evidence would not be needed. [b]so transitional forms in the fossil record are just nothing? Documented changes in modern times is just coincidence?[/b] This book is promoted as the bible for evolution but it actually has evidence against evolution. [b]no its promoted as the base model for how life changes[/b] Quote by Darwin: “Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.” [b]so because Darwin asked questions, its false? You're an idiot.[/b] If numerous species, belonging to the same genera or families, have really started into life all at once, the fact would be fatal to the theory to descent with slow modification though natural selection. [b]I don't even know what you're saying here. All the numerous genus and species didn't start into life all at once, they came at different points from their ancestors. [/b] [/quote] Evolution doesn't live and die with Darwin. Its has so much evidence outside of him proposing it. Its not like the bible, its not something that he said and is now just accepted. Its heavily investigated, and constantly being refined.
-
What im showing in that reply is that your evolutionists and writers .... Atheists .... They all contradict themselves and discredit themselves by saying their own theories were wrong later. They can't and you can't prove the bible to be wrong, or anything Jesus has done wasnt real .... But your so called theorists can be and HAVE been proven wrong.
-
Edited by Britton: 3/11/2015 6:33:44 PMYou show no example of contradiction or how they prove themselves wrong. Questioning your own conclusions is how you find out If that conclusion is correct or not. I know that notion is foreign to you, but that's how it works. I'm not disproving Jesus, I'm saying you have no proof for Jesus and his "holiness"
-
Wolves would not have evolved into the dogs we have today, because many traits which our modern breeds of dogs contain are not advantageous in a natural environment. For example, labrador retrievers are prone to having hip displacement problems, which means that they become less effective hunters and are more likely to live shorter lives if they contract this problem. Humans bred dogs to have desirable traits for humans, but this breeding has made these 'species' (in order for something to be considered a different species it can no longer produce offspring with its predecessor) has made them dependant on humans. They would simply be outcompeted by the natural wolf because it has evolved into an apex predator, which is designed to thrive in its own environment. Also, evolution cannot occur in one animal. That is a mutation, and will not be passed on, unless it provides an advantage which allows that specific animal to breed more.
-
Dogs have evolved from wolves into dogs.
-
Lol oh goodness .... They were bred .... Mated .... Wolves didn't evolve into the dogs we have today! Your telling me if we could go and watch a single wolf from back in the day it would have evolved into a german Shepard or lab? No, we bred other species with wolves and in turn it gave us our dogs of today.
-
Your knowledge base is clearly based upon assumptions and misinformation, on both evolution and how dogs were bred from wolves. I have niether the time, energy nor initiative to inform you of the factual, historical or scientific bases of any of these.
-
You my friend r a lost cause ..... Wolves evolved into dogs .... An international team of researchers generated genome sequences from three gray wolves – one each from China, Croatia, and Israel, the three countries where dogs are believed to have originated. They then sequenced the genome of a basenji dog from central Africa and a dingo from Australia. Both the regions have been historically isolated from wolf populations, according to a press release by The University of Chicago Medical Center. There does exist some amount of genetic overlap between some modern dogs and wolves. But this is thought to be the result of interbreeding after dogs were domesticated, not a direct line of descent from one group of wolves. Domestic dogs were bred and these admixtures are hybrids produced due to interbreeding between two different population groups.
