{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
3/10/2015 2:34:08 AM
1
-
I mean, if you find simple googling and cursory knowledge of biology to be difficult, then yes you might find it as convoluted as religion.
-
Because everything someone else writes somewhere is always 100% true.
-
Do you not know how to check sources?
-
In person or it didn't happen
-
You wont see an animal evolve into something else, ever, because of the timeframe it takes. Viruses, bacteria, etc, you can see with your own two eyes.
-
It is when I can go check its validity.
-
With what someone else's word on someone else's word?
-
Edited by Britton: 3/10/2015 3:01:42 AMNo every experiment throughout history that is the basis for our scientific knowledge can be recreated and have the same results. That's one of the points of doing basic experiments in science class. To show that the results, when an experiment is performed correctly and under the same conditions, will always be the same for that particular experiment.
-
How do we know anything is true
-
I'm not getting into some philosophical bullshit argument. If you wanna discuss science, let's discuss science. If you wanna discuss philosophy, we can do that too. But don't try and use one against the other.
-
Edited by Thedude7388: 3/10/2015 3:05:18 AMWhy not you fukin topic [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url]!
-
Because if you want to disprove science you need to use the scientific method. A.k.a. more science.
-
So I need this to disprove it's self
-
No you need evidence to the contrary. Not philosophy.
-
Right.........Well I guess we're at a crossroads here
-
Edited by Britton: 3/10/2015 3:22:11 AMYep. If you wanna argue science you need to get on science's level. Its like arguing math equations because bacon taste good.
