Yes! I'm glad you finally asked and deviated from your one sided ridiculous stand point. The complaint you made was a requisition to adjust a certain point in a video game (which is online based). Which is totally moronic and ironic that you are trying to make a rule while telling me that they're no rules to the Internet. Arbitrarily you tell me that your complaint is legitimate (which is you trying to create a boundary) While at the same time you're telling me that the law doesn't apply to the Internet and my point is illegitimate. The point is, if the law doesn't apply to the "internationally bound" Internet than neither does your feeble attempt to make a rule since rules don't exist where things are "internationally bound". If your rule is legitimate than my freedom of speech/religion is also. Hence your complaint is completely and totally idiotic being that your wholesome complaint is that "I see a [url=http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law]-godwinslaw!-[/url] symbol and this should be removed" meaning you either are taking away your own freedom to do whatever the hell you want.Or by limiting your self with your rule you were simply wrong. Checkmate bitch. And here's this. After I joyously broke down the false logic in this discussion here's the cold facts. the laws of the state/nation in which the user resides, the laws of the state/nation that apply where the server hosting the transaction is located, and the laws of the state/nation which apply to the person or business with whom the transaction takes place. So a user in one of the United States conducting a transaction with another user in Britain through a server in Canada could theoretically be subject to the laws of all three countries as they relate to the transaction at hand.[5] This is a direct piece from an article reiterating cyberspace law. Stop pretending like you know anything before you open your prodigiously stupid mouth.