I see you getting a lot of feedback about lawsuits. I recommend looking into the semantics of what parody is versus fair use. For example: a public domain photo (released for publicity) of Peter Dinklage used as the head of an armored Guardian. In the picture the Guardian's armor resembles but is not identical to armor that is used in the game itself. Also in the picture, Peter Dinklage has a mustache. The caption reads "Destiny is better with facial hair" Then on the back of the T-shirt is a small floating tetrahedron shaped thingy with a lens-like eye that resembles a ghost somewhat. It it also has a goatee. This would probably fall under the fair use as parody protection. This is just an example off the top of my head, as an example of what you "might" be able to do legally to sell a shirt... picking apart this particular example with the actual laws isn't necessary, the point is that you should really research the law and work around it. Of course, whether what you do is legal or not may not matter if someone hires lawyers to make your life hell. If they don't like it enough to spend a ton and keep you tied up in court until you are bankrupt, the law doesn't matter which is BS. A man made a parody of the brand North Face. He turned the logo upside down and called it South Butt. Upside down the logo looked kind of like a butt, & North Face sued him and even though many say that South Butt is an obvious parody, he still lost so just research and be careful.