So a design problem gets forgiven because it's a remake? Why would that be? A problem with the base structure of a game shouldn't be forgiven with a remake. Your premise that altering the map would turn it into a sequel is a fallacy, as that would simply be another update to bring the game into the present and correct pre-existing design flaws. There's precedent for that. And there's precedent for remakes of games that don't age as well as we'd hoped. It's important to note that the review is an opinion, and you're welcome to disagree with any and every review ever. In fact, you should because you aren't exact same person as the reviewer and your opinions will differ. Reviews aren't the final say for how much you'll like the game. [i]You[/i] are. Worrying about one or two points is crazy. You liked the remakes, and that's awesome. So who gives a crap if one person's opinion doesn't jive with yours? Enjoy your games, and take reviews with a grain of salt. Use them as a guide for your moneymaking decisions, not a bible. [spoiler]7.8 is a really positive score. 5 is mediocre. On a scale of 1-10, 7.8 is seven-point-great.[/spoiler]