You should probably start reading entire reviews, man. I just read the review out of curiosity, and you know what they actually said? "I know it's not new complaint, but Hoenn is still imbalanced type-wise, heavily favoring water. It's especially noticeable in Alpha Sapphire, in which Team Aqua...use a lot of water types." "You also have to navigate many bodies of water, since much of the late-game involves the HMs Surf and Dive to get from place to place. Diving was really neat back in 2002, but I found it incredibly tedious in Alpha and Omega -- an obvious example of how superfluous some HMs are." Games age, and it looks to me like the reviewer took into account both how they felt about the originals, and how the redone version stacks up against current games. In an RPG, an abundance of enemies of a certain type will get tedious, and imbalance the game's difficulty by making it too easy. And moving around a map is most of what you do in an RPG, so if that base action isn't enjoyable, there's a problem. And then, in the Verdict, which I imagine is all you read, not only does the reviewer say the game does a fantastic job of reintroducing Hoenn, but also that small updates and tweaks help make the journey smoother. And as a remake, it's imperfections are still there. Sounds pretty straight-up to me. Remakes often carry the original flaws with them. Anything else you need me to debunk?