originally posted in:Liberty Hub
Visit that link and take a moment to browse the page.
Seriously, do it. You won't regret it. It's shocking.
For those who don't look, let me describe this abomination to you. The Rutgers Dean of Students web section has a page dedicated to BPEC. BPEC stands for Bias Prevention and (re)Education Committee. At the top of the page is a poster with four words.
Stop hate.
Report bias.
I'll quote a few sections of the page.
[quote]Think Before you Speak[/quote]
[quote]Free Yourself - Lose stereotypes about any group. There is no such thing as a “positive” stereotype. All stereotypes are inherently negative, hurtful, and damaging.[/quote]
[quote]If you experience or witness an act of bias or hate, report it to someone in authority. You may file a report on line at www.bias.rutgers.edu and you will be contacted within 24 hours.[/quote]
[quote]Bias acts are often disruptive. However, such acts may not always be in violation of civil, criminal or University codes, and therefore will not result in discipline. Acts of bias may warrant discussion or education about how they affect other members of the University community.[/quote]
What [i]is[/i] this? Is this normal? This is terribly Orwellian, if you ask me. The only silver lining here is that this appears to be isolated to only Rutgers, and as far as I know, they have the authority to form BPEC.
Here's how they define an "act of bias."
[quote]Bias is defined by the University as an act, verbal, written, physical, psychological, that threatens, or harms a person or group on the basis of race, religion, color, sex, age, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, national origin, ancestry, disability, marital status, civil union status, domestic partnership status, atypical heredity or cellular blood trait, military service or veteran status.[/quote]
You may read this and think, "Well golly gee, Stallcall, you've got it all wrong. Your liberty bells are going off for no reason. Clearly they've defined it as something that would warrant criminal charges. Explicitly harming somebody or threatening somebody's safety is arguably a criminal act."
Sure, that's what I thought to myself -- until I read the disclaimer at the bottom of the page.
[quote]Bias acts are often disruptive. However, such acts may not always be in violation of civil, criminal or University codes, and therefore will not result in discipline. Acts of bias may warrant discussion or education about how they affect other members of the University community.[/quote]
In other words, "Because the offending actions may not [i]technically[/i] be criminal, we can't guarantee that the perpetrator will face negative consequences from authority. However, we'll still take the opportunity to correct any 'wrong' opinions."
This is an isolated case, obviously. However, I worry that policies like this may start to become mainstream. Perhaps I'm overreacting. But, at the very least, BPEC signifies a tolerance towards reporting your peers for holding a "wrong" opinion or saying the wrong thing.
[b]TL;DR[/b] - Rutgers University has a Bias Prevention and Education Committee. It's open 24/7, and encourages you to report "acts of bias" committed by your peers. "Acts of bias may warrant discussion or education about how they affect other members of the University community."
What do you make of this? Is this a positive or negative cultural trend? Or is it a trend at all?
I encourage anybody interested in topics like this to join the group Liberty Hub.
Edit: Check this out. YouTuber Sargon of Akkad had this featured in a video last year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=temJVn-h33E
At 6:48, he examines the "Think Before you Speak" headline. Beneath it reads, [b]"There is no such thing as "free" speech. All speech has a cost and consequences."[/b] Visit the page now. That particular sentence has been taken down.
-
No such thing as a positive stereotypes? I guess blacks should run slower than a snail and Asians should say "-blam!- algebra!" then. Wouldn't want anybody making fun of them for having abilities that are useful in the world! Jesus -blam!-ing christ! I can understand being opposed to a stereotype that makes you look bad but if you're good at something then you should be recognized for it! It's not insulting! If someone ever got offended by me telling them they're good at math or able to run fast then they have a mental problem plain and simple. Only under liberal rule can a compliment become an insult! Pretty soon we're not gonna be able to communicate to each other effectively at all.
-
Hahahahahahaha You'd expect university students to Realize these two simple things. 1. Opinions cannot be wrong or right. They can be valid or invalid. 2. It is impossible to get rid of steryotypes because our brains subconsciously form them as we interact with people
-
-
-
>opinion >wrong Ok
-
How can opinion be wrong? It's an opinion?
-
Edited by Britton: 5/31/2016 6:48:11 PMSounds like dumb people are being dumb again. Shocker.
-
Liberalism destroys free speech
-
1984 was the first thing that came to mind
-
These guys need to go read [i]Fahrenheit 451[/i]
-
They realize that it is impossible to have unbiased opinions, right?
-
Edited by LowIQPlayz3445: 5/31/2016 6:49:05 AMIsn't the point behind schools to allow the free flow of speech and ideas, however controversial and unpopular? How can you learn if you're only allowed to hold a single position on any given topic without the administration coming after you?
-
This is almost like a safety net for them. 99% of complaints will probably be written off with a uniform "we have heard and understand your complaint" type nonsense response. Their lawyers more than likely suggested it to help them from being sued. PC Culture is running rampant and people want to make sure their ass is covered if a situation arises.
-
Personally I don't see a problem. I don't see why educating people on something, especially at a university, would be a bad thing. It's not like they're forcing people to report shit.
-
Its basically just saying don't be a dick.
-
The sheer autism of this thread's comments is mind numbing yet painful, I think I went into a catatonic state where my -blam!-ing brain had to -blam!-ing reboot. Jesus Christ, people, that shit just physically made me feel pain and then I slipped into a complete -blam!-ing soulless void before rebooting as if my brain was being violated like Windows 10 does to a PC. -blam!-... [spoiler]Tl;Dr: I just died for a moment because of this shit[/spoiler]
-
Censor the truth that you don't want to hear. Censor any information that goes against your opinions. Sounds a awful lot like fascism.
-
In this case, you are definitely overreacting. The reason it says it may not be criminal in its nature is because there are no laws against me saying, for example, "What're you gonna do about it, hick? Gonna go cry as you bone your cousin and fondle your gun?"
-
But I'm sensitive and need a safe space free from anything mildly offensive. Unless we're bashing white male Christians because that's ok.
-
Hahaha that's hilarious
-
Someone there needs to start an anti-Thoughtcrime and Thought Police campaign
-
America 2016. Thanks liberalism.
-
I bet they won't do anything about hate speech towards whites.
-
Good post.
-
tldr reported to the collage
-
Asians have small penises and do good in math Black people live in the hood and smoke drugs and talk all dat gansta shit Americans can't do subtly British people constantly eat tea and biscuits The Muslims are goat shepherds New Zealanders are sheep -blam!-ers Eskimos live in igloos The Canadians are far too nice and apologetic Russians drink vodka all the time Hispanics have big butts etc... [spoiler]eat it, Rutgers.[/spoiler]