Before you answer, please read these two statements about the question, so that your answer is not inherently flawed by a misunderstanding.
[b][i][u]-CONSERVATIVE AND RADICAL ARE BEING USED HERE AS TERMS TO DEFINE YOUR PERSONAL PHILOSOPHICAL OUTLOOK ON SOCIETY AND LIFE AS A WHOLE AND NOT JUST POLITICS.
-"WAGING WAR" IS DESCRIBING THE PROCESS OF OFFENSIVE WARFARE, AND NOT DEFENSIVE WARFARE. WAGING WAR IS STARTING AN OFFENSIVE ON ANOTHER IN ORDER FOR THE WAR WAGER TO GAIN SOMETHING. NOT TO DEFEND ONES SECURITY. [/u][/i][/b]
[b]Is Waging War justifiable?[/b]
Also, every time you vote in a poll and don't comment, you will receive paper cuts in between each of your toes. And then you will be forced to run a marathon.
-
I guess I'm gonna go with apathetic, as I do not know what it means and will make me seem smarter for doing so. In all seriousness, the only reason one should go to war is to help and protect other people, whether it be to defend oneself or to defend others who require help. However, the benefits of war, when you disregard the loss of life (which is awful), is great for commercial entities, and in the case of major standoffs/wars, the competition for development of new technological advancements. I am an atheist independent, so I don't know where this classifies me, but who gives a hoot-its off topic anyway.