{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Liberty Omega
View Entire Topic
2/1/2015 10:55:42 PM
41
There is no such thing as a 'gay gene'
Right off the bat you should know it's just media headline bait simply because homosexuality makes it extremely difficult to pass on genes to children. But even then, we have a very small understanding of human neurology compared to what we need to know to understand these sorts of things that it's truly an irrelevant endeavor to search for a specific gene that only homosexuals have.
Why does the LGBTOMGBBQLOL movement feel that there needs to be some sort of genetic natural-ness to homosexuality in order to make it justifiable? How could you not be under the impression that homosexuals themselves know that being gay is a lifestyle choice and they lie about it and convince themselves otherwise because they know they'd have a much harder time getting support for their cause.
Bottom line: There is no gay gene, and if you demand homosexuality is genetic, you are only separating yourself from science.
English
#Offtopic
-
9 RepliesEdited by GoodBoyTroy: 2/2/2015 7:04:48 AMAs a homosexual myself, I would like to speak in response to everyone else's post to this thread. I believe, from my experience of my orientation, that it is a combination of both gene [i]and[/i] choice. Sexual drive [i]is[/i] a gene every human is born with, however, it is a choice how an individual will accept arousal through development stages of childhood. I am shy, I am anxious, I am quiet. I did not make those decisions to be those things, they just occurred to me in my life and when they did I reacted in a way similar to: "Whoa, this is un-comforting." while some other individual may be thinking, "I enjoy this, yes." And, from there, [i]decides[/i] to research more into it, or completely dedicate themselves to an activity or feeling. When choice and gene are mashed together, the outcome is essentially a person's personality which includes opinions. For example, I do not find women attractive in a sexual or romantic way. Yes, those women on magazine covers are gorgeous, but I'm not the one who will be...[i]pleasing myself[/i] to their images. My opinion of choice would be men are the more attractive sex. Referring to @SwaguSenpai 's statement about bugs being scary, its similar to how I feel toward women. My experience with women has made me dislike females in sexual/romantic ways. Its not only the reproductive system that's just...gross to me, but it is how they can be [i]too[/i] dedicated to one view in a relationship or lifestyle that is hard to work and be flexible with. That is estrogen at it's best and I do not like it's wrath. My genes of sexual interest tell me "male" due to my experiences, however, it is my choice if I want to follow through with those emotions of interest to understand it more...to make sure I truly know what is going on in my mind when I see something that peaks my interest. I apologize for the lengthy post, but I felt strongly about both sides. [b]Also, this...is my first time being open about my orientation online so please keep extreme views to yourself and I will respect you.[/b]
