{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/26/2015 7:56:25 PM
1
Okay. I'll explain. Halo is based off humanity in the late 26th century. Star wars is in the late 3000 BC ( proof is in lost arc Indiana Jones R2 D2 and C3PO are hieroglyphs.) It would take Star wars 5.6 thousand years to ascend to the same year as Halo. Therefore their tech gets that many years to evolve. Star wars does not get effected by realitivity ( they warp drive and nothing happens) so therefore travel to halo galaxy would not change years.
English
-
The technology doesn't evolve on its own as time passes, so how does that make sense
-
Intelligence evolves, discovery evolves. Humans make technology and with time comes new technology. Thats what I meant.
-
But to get to the hypothetical battle everyone has to be in a light speed capable craft. What star wars' scientists could accomplish in that state would be limited, and they'd end up with about the same tech as we know from the movies. Right?
-
Or wait.... Are the forerunners star wars' humans Mind blown...
-
That crazy moment when you realize you created the halo universe.
-
[spoiler]they knew it. Hail hydra.[/spoiler]
-
"Snake, you've created a time paradox!"
-
O_0 Too much... I need to take a nap.
-
Star wars has speed that is more advanced than light speed. The entire point I'm making is that star wars would crush halo due to the technological superiority if they both arrived in the same time.
-
Okay. It would be a lot easier for you guys to make your point that star wars would win if Disney hadn't come along and dumped on the past 30 years of lore. So much sympathy.
