{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/9/2015 6:41:24 PM
3
-
So was IB, it was not even what they said it was and had to re-issue the event to make it right. LO @ U & the bungie PvP side responsible for it....
-
Were you there for the first iron banner event? It was literally control with a different name. It was literally pointless outside of getting a weapon or two, which you could've done just as easily through normal crucible. With the first and only queens wrath event, you were getting xp through bounties that were at least a little different than your average ones, then have to complete missions to get new, guaranteed legendary armor and weapons. It did more for the community than the first iron banner did by far, despite being just as broken as IB 1. Again, I'll ask and wait for an ACTUAL answer; why are we seeing the THIRD iron banner in a row while we've only had ONE pve event?
-
so was the first iron banner. but they fixed THAT in a week and a half.
-
Iron Banner 1.0 [i]was awful[/i] but not anywhere near as bad and pointless as QW
-
really? i got my first set of purps in 4 days with QW, and that kept me until the raid was doable by LFG. my Supremacy was inly replaced by my prudence II because i <3 NM. meanwhile timurs lash from the first IB was outplayed by most blue HC in regular crucible. anyone who got past rank 2 was quitting games the second they fell behind, i won half of my IB games due to full teams quitting for wins only. i think you just like pvp. i like both. lets leave it at that.
-
It was fine for the first two days and then they completely destroyed the loot system. I play both, quick gear/stat check would show you that.
