{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/8/2015 12:12:52 AM
1
-
By proving my existence in a thread in which I must prove my existence? [spoiler]U Mad Bro[/spoiler]
-
You didn't prove your existence.
-
Yes I did, by the simple act of commenting, then arguing, I have proved my existence.
-
Lol ok. Like I said, you arguing and posting could simply be projections of my brain. You have no way of proving that you are more than that.
-
Then again, I'll use that same logic, skip the details, you also do not exist. Putting us back where we started. Beginning the cycle once more, because you cannot accept defeat.
-
Any one of us could be the intelligence projecting all the rest.
-
But an intelligence would still exist. This does not prove your point.
-
But you can't prove you're the intelligence, therefore you can't prove you exist,
-
That is beside the point, no matter what I am, human or intelligence, I exist.
-
Again, you can't prove that. You may be an illusion of an actual intelligence. Your thoughts are not your own, but rather the intelligence's thoughts projected through you.
-
But for their thought to pass through me, I must first exist. My point remains.
-
Not if you are just an illusion. Then you don't exist. That's like saying someone who hallucinates about a person makes that projected person real because the hallucination can talk.
-
Illusions are mental projections that have no effect on the world around us. I am tapping certain spots on this tablet that I use. Sending commands to type this message. Thus sending this message to the Internet. Then to you. I have sentience, and a diverse mind to provide multiple arguments. As apposed to your single argument. I think, interact with the physical world, and am smart enough to see that you have just updated to rules to say that I must only prove my existence. Arguments work both ways. If I cannot disprove your existence, then you are not allowed to disprove my existence. There for, by my superior knowledge about arguments, I exist. Accept defeat, you have already lost. And long before this comment. As your only claim thus far, even with different wording, is "you could be an hallucination, so you do not exist." You have changed the rules to set yourself up for victory in any circumstance. You have yet to counter my claims with another reason other then your "illusion" response. I exist one way or another, you have lost, and I claim victory. This fight, while long, was a simple one on my part. Game over and checkmate, I am done here.
-
Edited by A84: 1/8/2015 1:57:25 AMBecause you can't prove that you are real. You're going off the assumption you must be real because the tablet must be real and this internet must be real. I am stating that everything could be an illusion. Also, by your argument, if I can't disprove your argument that Thor exists, then you can't disprove my argument that Jesus exists.
-
I have proven that I am real, by two claims and a counter argument. Your ignorance keeps it from you. I am done here, I have proven that I am real and will no longer respond to your attempts to disprove that fact. Good day sir.
-
Lol k kid
