{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
1/5/2015 6:30:44 PM
9
-
-
Her smelling something, before knowing it was me, is proof i exist. I wasnt present for her to make the claim, or in other words, for me to create the perception another perceived me.
-
Did you smell it?
-
Yes and no, being that its my poop, it isnt offensive to me, unless its a beer shit.
-
There's no yes [i]and[/i] no. Only yes [i]or[/i] no. Did you smell it?
-
It didnt register, but being that i was in proximity, and cant hold my breath that long, it would be assumed i smelt it. But being im used to the smell of my own shit, i didnt acknowledge it. So logically yes, existentially no
-
Edited by A84: 1/6/2015 5:02:09 PMBut if you can't say you smelt it, do you think that would uphold in an argument?
-
If you cant prove you exist, we cant prove we exist. If you can prove you exist and no one else does, we can prove we exist and that no one else does. If you wont accept anyones answer but your own, that does not mean we will do the same. That is proof that there is more than one intelligence present in this discussion. Anyones refute to this argument, or agreement, is further proof. Division is the proof. Unity is the proof. Whether we are all of one body, or many bodys of one mind, or many minds of one body, or one body one mind, or multiple bodys and multiple minds, is irrelevant if we can all argue with one another. They all have the same effect if things like thos thread can take place. Did I answer? Not the way you wanted me to. Am I right? Yes.
-
By your logic, everything is proof. Lol
