{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/10/2014 1:12:56 AM
1
What you're saying would be true, except the word "she" is used [i]every[/i] time a Hive Witch is mentioned... If "he" was used even once, you'd be correct, but since Bungie and/or Activision imply all witches are she's(as is true to the definition), then we can assume all warlocks(the dictionary male version) are male.
English
-
No. You're making an assumption of causation. That because one thing here is this way must mean that over there is as well. Hive Witches aren't actual Witches. This is all creative license. The creator determines the rules of their creation. That's their prerogative. And whatever those rules are they are never wrong unless the creator says they are or they're convinced they are. If I wanted I could create a world where hell is above and heaven below. Where good is evil and evil good. And I would be right. In the context of my world. My point is the world is always in flux and change happens whether people admit it or not. Especially, in how we view and interpret the world around us. And it's not a bad thing. Not always anyway.
-
I suppose so. It just struck me as odd that they kept their Witches to the book definition, leading me to think the same should be true for "Warlock" and "Hunter". Although, I can't really say the same for Exo's since they're completely original as far as I know. (Except maybe that they end in "o" as a traditionally male characteristic of latin-based language...but I can't really prove it)
