{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/2/2014 2:52:19 PM
1
You can think that, but in my opinion, it's hypocritical. I think you should have to farm materials, but now you don't. You don't want to grind patrols for materials. I don't want to grind Crucible for Marks. I already had what I wanted. Why does giving you what you want necessitate taking away what I already have?
English
-
It doesn't. It just seems like since they are crucible marks, they should be gotten from crucible. Plus you don't really need them. You can just get vanguard stuff.
-
There are only 2 vanguard vendors, already have all that stuff. The factions should not be crucible marks only. They have crucible vendors for that.
-
There's only two vendors for Vanguards. There's 5 for Crucible. If they allowed using Vanguard Marks for the Factions, that would alleviate some of my issue, even though two of the weapons I want are only available from that vendor. The other problem is that I now have no use for my excess farming materials beyond discarding them, which sucks. I can see giving people more options, but don't take others away. There's now no incentive to farm. Remove the need, not the incentive.
-
Yeah I think making the factions accept both types of marks would be better. They just need to find a middle ground.
