{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
12/2/2014 11:00:22 AM
2
As i said that was a good point and I agree it was also unnecessary to remove since Id never think someone traded 50 mats for 5 marks in the first place. I'd rather keep saving it for new weapons and armors I upgraded. Hell I tried entire sets of NM, dead orbit, vanguard, crucible, and fwc armors to see what worked best for me. Not going to mention all the weapons I maxed out then trashed. Hell I spent over 200 relic iron on just one set of warlock gear one time. I've grind out tons of mats and id never part with them since I know ill use them in like 15 minutes.
English
-
Mats are much much easier to gain than rep/marks. I'll be damned if I'd trade 10 marks for only 20 mats. I can get twenty mats (except relic iron) way faster than 10 marks, without the effort. Simple solution: replace vg marks with crucible when you do strikes with faction items.
-
They might be easier because you have to try to die in patrol which makes it mind numbing boring to gather. My point was though it is 10 to 1 ratio, that is just horrible trade in any mmo or game I have ever played. As someone pointed out though "Something was taken away that he enjoyed. Don't worry about why he liked it. Put yourself in his shoes and imagine a mechanic in the game that you use being removed. It was unnecessary." I have to agree it was taken out unnecessary, since i have no idea why anyone would make the trade in the first place.
-
I'd much rather use them for Crucible Marks in order to buy those Faction items in the first place. To each their own. At least we can agree that taking out options is a bad idea. Stop subtracting. Just add.
-
Yup, common ground we can agree on is always a good thing to find.
