{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
11/28/2014 10:26:04 AM
8
True randomness doesn't take into account what has been rolled previously.
If you roll a dice and land 6.. that doesn't mean the dice remembers it rolled a 6 and there's a possibility to roll 6 again, multiple times.
You can't use math to determine randomness, sure you can determine what percentage (6 items - 4 weeks - outcome) but that doesn't disprove RNG.
English
-
It doesn't disprove it, but makes it very unlikely (very low probability). It's like with the dice, it doesn't take into account what the previous roll was, but it is still unlikely to roll 6s 10 times in a row
-
yeah i know, very unlikely, but by random chance it could happen :P but i agree it's a low probability :)
-
Now let's factor in the fact that the Armamentarium has been sold 5 out of the last 7 times :p
-
Very well said. I was going to attempt to explain this, but I couldn't have done it so succinctly.
-
[url]http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/00000/2000/300/2318/2318.strip.gif[/url]
-
That is true, i didnt disprove it, but i highly doubt that the case is true RNG, maybe some things are weighted more then others etc.
-
oh yeah, i get that, it's suspicious how it seems to be the same things over and over lol.
-
Yeah I did make a large generalization at that.
