It's not like you payed for Halo and got less content. You never spent your money on it. We spent our money on dlc, for less content.
English
-
Edited by CLEMO86 v2: 10/30/2014 2:57:02 AMI spend the same as you on sky rim DLC and had to wait a year to get it after 360 and I spent the same on cod and BF4 season passes and Xbox gets them before us. I hate exclusives by 3rd parties, and would not be bothered in the slightest if Xbox got this content at the same time as PS. But u can't complain about exclusive when they only effect you. If u don't like this treatment, then stope talking from a hard done by Xbots perspective, and try to get both sides of the community together as we're all getting screwed over as consumers.
-
Edited by SAW2TH 55th: 11/1/2014 2:40:46 PMThe difference is is that PS users and XBOX users paid the same amount for unequal product. It isn't like you paid for your Skyrim content and THEN had to wait a year for it. As it has been said before, console exclusive titles =\= exclusive content for paid DLC. If they charged XBOX users less for the reduced content, that would still suck but would be more fair. As an aside, you would think that the disappointing size of the game would encourage Bungie to hustle out more content to keep its player base up until the first DLC, and perhaps speed up release of exclusive content to the other platform.
-
We never got the chance to.
-
Yeah well I didn't get a chance to buy half the games on PC, because I don't own a gaming PC. Bungie gets big off of Halo on Xbox and then gives us the shaft, sickening.
-
I wouldn't get mad if a game was PS exclusive and I could never buy it. I WOULD get mad if I bought the game and it turns out the other console gets more.