{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/29/2014 5:18:21 PM
10
Having exclusive DLC is a jumping the shark moment in the gaming industry
English
-
Not really its not. Remember exclusive splinter cell missions?
-
You mean the game where the head developer said it was originally an Xbox game and it had a total of one map DLC? Lol try harder.
-
The splinter cell missions were console exclusive not a timed exclusive. So therefore those were more rage worthy than a year timed exclusive for a handful of strikes.
-
It only had one map in the entire DLC. It gave weekly updates to both consoles. Try again.
-
There are differences in the story and details between the main version of Splinter Cell (Ubisoft Montreal, Xbox and PC) and the version on PlayStation 2/GameCube (Ubisoft Shanghai). Some of the levels are exclusive redesigns based on the levels in version 1. Most are shorter, and punctuated by full-motion cutscenes. The PlayStation 2 version includes four additional levels set in a nuclear power plant in Russia (Sam is wearing a winter splinter cell uniform).[1]
-
That isn't talking about the DLC
-
It is talking about console exclusive missions, no different to what is going on with the Sony deal and Destiny except Xbox players will get those missions free of charge next year. Unlike in Splinter Cell where they were completely exclusive.
-
Changing the goalposts. This conversation is about DLC. Try again.
-
This conversation is about exclusivity. Try again dumb-blam!-
-
This is one strike in the entire DLC on a planet we have already visited, you try again dumbass.
