{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/20/2014 6:34:33 PM
11
Asking for subjective reasons to prove that destiny is better is stupid but I'll humor you.
1. I dont have to worry about dying due to lack of oxygen.
2. Able to switch out skills and the like at no cost and at will.
3. There's other stuff to do besides campaign.
4. Sparrows.
5. No claptrap.
English
-
If youre worried about O2 youre doing something wrong.
-
The pre-sequel has an oxygen meter. I dont follow.
-
I know. I've never come close to dying for lack of oxygen. Even when exploring and going around. I really expected it to be annoying, but I'mhaving a blast with Oz kits. It really helps bridge the gap in the gunplay.
-
Eh. The fact that it's there is what bothers me. If you never have to worry about it then why even have it at all.
-
It would be weird if you simply have the ability to boost and slam for no reason. Not having to monitor oxy, even if its just in the periphery would be a break from the reality of the game. The biggest issue I have with it is the kraggons dropping O2 tanks and oxy geysers. Otherwise its not in the way and feels fairly natural.
-
True but destiny is also not abiding by the same kind of rules. Why do we need helmets on earth? Why isn't the gravity less on moon?
-
"Cuz the traveler" would be my guess. Or maybe the moon is an egg.
-
Eh plausible.
-
#Got'em
-
Reasonable reasons *emails cookie*[spoiler]this is the internet and my opinion is fact! >:)[/spoiler]
-
Edited by FeralSoul: 10/20/2014 6:51:16 PMNo claptrap is a biggy...he's F**king annoying
