{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/20/2014 3:15:36 PM
1
Can you disprove my example?
No. Why? Because I am right.
So, what's your point?
English
-
Pfft... you piss & moan about the titan getting two nades... Uhhh hello, the lock can throw like 8 nades with radiance, self-resurrect himself, and I'm confident there's a perk where he gets two starting nades.. Not only that but there are various armors that increase heavy ammo & special ammo for the lock. You just need to stop being an idiot, that is all.
-
You believe the naked classes are imbalanced? That is another topic. Your argument appears to be that without this piece of armour titans are underpowered compared to warlocks. That is a nonsensical argument, and if true the way to address the balance would very obviously not be by having a special chest of armour. Let's stick to the OP topic which is armour. Warlocks do not have an equivalent for that titan chest example.
-
The problem is that you're an idiot. You see, the Warlock gets a fcking perk that gives him two nades. Thusly, he doesn't need a goddam armor piece that gives him more grenades. You then bitched about heavy ammo and special ammo capacity... look again, moron, lock has armor that give that too. Instead of being a dimwitted schmuck, why not try using one or two braincells. Hell, try using two at one time. Perhaps then you will be able to dislodge your cranium from your rectum. We can only hope.
