{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/3/2014 8:49:18 AM
1
I'm fairly certain his incorrect info graphic is referring to methane gases, which make up approximately 18% of green house has emissions. Obviously, not all a product of livestock farming.
I'm not sure how you can argue that human beings as we exist today are not designed, through evolution, to consume meat...so, yeah.
And lastly you lose points for obviously not even reading the article I posted, which very clearly states numbers 4 and 5 cannot be supplemented for and also states that while a vegan can "survive" it is definitely not optimal for your health
English
-
Edited by Pendulate: 10/3/2014 9:42:58 AMThe link I provided says otherwise. Livestock farming contributes to the total greenhouse gases in the same vicinity. I did not at all say that we didn't evolve to eat meat. You are moving the goalposts. I fully acknowledge that we evolved the capacities to better extract energy from meat, thanks to evolutionary mutations. This has nothing to do with the universe "intending" us to eat meat. Your article is simply wrong. DHA supplements are available (i) and carnosine production, while endogenous and not necessary to supplement, can be increased by consuming beta alanine. (ii) It is a fact of basic nutrition that all nutrients can be obtained from non-animal sources. A vegan diet is more than viable to achieve optimal health. i: http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B005R5CARY?pc_redir=1412269268&robot_redir=1 ii: http://www.veganhealth.org/articles/carnosine
