{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
10/1/2014 6:28:53 PM
1
I'd say they should be independent. They could find investors to raise the capital for the game and make the game how they wanted. Bungie has a long proven track record which would allow them attract investors easily.
If I had to chose a publisher I'd say EA. Mass Effect 3 and titanfall both continued to give free content along with dlc. Titanfall suffered the same backlash as Destiny, lack of content, but has been improving. I even remember Burnout Paradise receiving tons of free content that really expanded the game.
English
-
I don't know about EA. What you said about Respawn and Bioware is true. But I'm apprehensive about two things: a) this gives EA a monopoly, which would jeopardise free content; b) working for the most corporate company, any game made by Bungie could potentially have more blemishes than Destiny because release dates would be determined by quartlety reports of the company.
-
I agree. EA is my choice only if I had too chose. I'd say Microsoft as well with the obvious success of the Halo franchise but would we even see destiny if Bungie hadn't have left. Also I like having a community of gamers of both systems
-
I concur, I like both systems. When Bioware went to both I found it refreshing. Same thing here too.
