{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
7/21/2014 7:50:58 AM
2
You don't need [b]aerodynamics[/b]* in space. There is literally no resistance of any kind whilst in space until you enter the gravitational field of a star or planet. And I think the big fark off thrusters would solve that issue
English
-
Aerodynamics have nothing to do with gravity though.
-
I know. I used gravitational force as an example of resistance in space, not a factor to be considered with aerodynamics
-
If you wanted to go FTL, the ship would need to be a certain shape, according to current theories.
-
They'll find it false in the future. But I didn't go to college for space shuttle design so... take that with a grain of salt, I do read a lot on such subjects though.
-
Edited by LogicalHuman: 7/21/2014 4:04:50 PMAs our technology and science advances, I'm sure we'll find better ways to go FTL, but the Alcubierre Drive is theoretically possible, as long as you have [i]exotic matter.[/i]
