Dear god... What I'm saying is that the (sacrifice for) [i]focus[/i] or exploitation of the female physique usually is a means to detract from meaningful story/character elements, not to mention it's highly unrealistic. "Protect those sternums and ta-tas, or maybe we need redesigned spacesuits that accentuate those female buns... decisions, decisions." The question is why is it necessary? I've already stated the reasons why turning the volume down on sexuality makes for a more artful composition. Are you not basically saying it's because you can't go a few hours without being aroused [i]while[/i] you're being entertained otherwise? As that video was meant to illustrate, the exploitation of the male form is viewed by most Europeans as perfectly acceptable. To many others, it is laughably ridiculous or uncomfortable and serves a mirroring function as that of its counterpart. Some people don't see the connection between the two at all and rather have it as they like it. Yes, many characters in video games/cinema/television are brainy and curvy but when I play one of those games, watch one of those movies or shows I have the same reaction that I have to many male action hero characters. It makes me laugh. Watch the new Chronicles of Riddick movie and if that doesn't prove my points then... then, well who gives a shit anyway? The best comparable antithesis I can think of right now that flew in the face of bullshit like that was Predators. <prays the sexy female character gods save me the trouble and kill me now>