JavaScript is required to use Bungie.net

OffTopic

Surf a Flood of random discussion.
originally posted in:Secular Sevens
Edited by Mad Max: 9/27/2013 8:24:23 PM
21

Can we talk about economic philosophies and politics?

[spoiler]Fair warning - I am by no means an economist, nor have I taken any economic classes outside of the intro classes I had to take in undergrad[/spoiler] What benefit is it to society to let true capitalism run its course? No government assistance programs, no "hand-outs", not "entitlements." Should we really support the "every man for himself" philosophy? Isn't it in our best interests, both as a country and as a society, to help those who cannot help themselves? We're only as strong as our weakest link, so don't we all benefit when we help each other? I understand that a great many don't enjoy paying taxes [or even go so far as to call it "theft"], but doesn't it help us all when we help each other; when we can provide for those who cannot provide for themselves?

Posting in language:

 

Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

View Entire Topic
  • A truly free society would require more work on part of consumers. Take a simple example. Buying meat at the grocery store. Today, the FDA imposes regulation and inspection, so the assumption is the meat is of a good quality. Obviously FDA is occasionally wrong and accidents happen, but for the most part you feel safe purchasing. The price you pay for this is higher meat cost (cost to producer for following regulation) and higher taxes (you pay for the FDA and enforcement). In a world with no FDA, businesses and people regulate. A meat producer would go to Wal-Mart and propose to be sold there. Free markets dictate that it is in Wal-Mart's best interest to not sell bad meat. If they do, they almost assuredly lose long term customers. Likewise, it is in a producer'a best interest to sell good meat for the same reason. The meat industry has a high cost of entry so there would be large risk to risking the entire business by cutting corners for short term gains. In this day and age, people are more informed about the products they buy and controversy surrounding them - it wouldn't take long for news to spread. The questions you ask yourself then are: 1. What quality difference is there between what the FDA sets and what Wal-Mart on its own would accept? 2. How much money is saved by allowing producers and distributors to regulate rather than the FDA? Like any decision, you end up with a cost/benefit analysis.

    Posting in language:

     

    Play nice. Take a minute to review our Code of Conduct before submitting your post. Cancel Edit Create Fireteam Post

    4 Replies
    You are not allowed to view this content.
    ;
    preload icon
    preload icon
    preload icon