I really don't think that's true. With the hypothesis that life ends how it began, there is actual reasoning and evidence. You didn't experience anything before you were born, and because death will bring about a biological state identical to the one before it (None), you can make the fewest assumptions by arguing it's most likely death ends with nothing. Simply because certain things are cyclical (And let's be clear, a lot of things aren't) does [i]not[/i] give you the right to arbitrarily slap the same nature onto something else without legitimate and coherent logic. So no, I heavily disagree with the idea that the three concepts are on-par.