{{
`${userDetail.user.displayName}${userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode ? `#${standardizeBungieGlobalCode(userDetail.user.cachedBungieGlobalDisplayNameCode)}` : ""}`}}
{{getUserClans()}}
originally posted in:Destiny
6/28/2013 4:10:05 PM
21
Halo is shit now, it stopped getting good after ODST. I don't care about anything Halo related anymore.
English
-
not true. reach and odst were alright but 4 is shit
-
This is a different battlefield for a different day, but I really had no problem with O.D.S.T. or Reach. I still play their campaigns and multiplayer once or twice every year. They switched out some spices and used different pork but ultimately, they taste like the same sausage.
-
Another hater. God I hate your kind.
-
Reach was good in my opinion. Could have been among the ranks of 2 and 3 if it had the proper tuning, but Bungie was too busy with Destiny and 343 doesn't know shit about competitive game design. Halo 4's campaign was great, but everything else was kind of shitty. You can't [i]replicate [/i]a Bungie game. Only Bungie can make a Bungie game. And that just sounds stupid, but it's true.
-
I honestly liked Reach and 4. The Halo 4 and Multiplayer is awesome and halo Reach forge is cool too.
-
Umm reach?
-
Nah. 4 may have issues but its far better than the spunkgargleweewee of today.
-
Not really, it's just that when people played halo 4 they had very high expectations of it which left them disappointed but I didn't so I enjoyed it. Now they've updated it off of player feedback which made the game fantastic! and also just so you know, that was 343's first major game so it's not going to be the greatest. Now that game basically told 343 what people want and what they need to improve on in the next title. Lets hope they follow through, if not I still enjoy the campaign anyways.
-
But they won't be making halo 5 for the Xbox 360 -blam!-
-
Even with 343's tuning I still despise the game. At it's very core, Halo 4 is casual. Heaps and heaps of aim assist and bullet magnetism.
-
First of all, Reach was also very bad so it wan't just a 343 thing. Though 343 took over reach and had a ton of feedback from Halo fans of what we didn't like in a Halo game a good ways before 4 came out and it still turned out to be shit. I haven't been keeping up with the Halo 4 updates recently, so I don't know if they fixed everything, buy for a long ass time, they're forums were absolutely FILLED with negative feedback about the game and all of it was ignored, so yeah from what I've seen, 343 hasn't been doing a good job with player feedback.
-
My problems with 4 are the ways they tried to make it appeal to the Call of Duty players, but (most of) those features were due to Microsoft money whoring. A lot of people criticize 343i and call them a young company, but they're spearheaded Frank O' Conner who's been making Halo since CE.
-
reach wasn't as bad as people thought it was. i personally enjoyed it.
-
Yeah reach was AMAZING I THOUGHT
-
Just because you enjoyed it doesn't mean it wasn't as bad as people think. It was bad to me and many others.
-
I loved it!
-
more people liked it. people thought it was another halo 3 but they tried something different and people hated it because of that. people want everything to stay the same. look at how successful call of duty is. multiplayer wise they change almost nothing.
-
I think you just contradicted yourself. So wouldn't that mean things staying the same is a good thing?
-
No he said that people don't want change, at least not large changes. But if Bungie made another Halo 3 people still would've hated it because it was too similar.
-
And I'm not looking for an argument so if you try to start one, don't expect me to reply
-
This is why there should only be Combat Evolved easter eggs !
